<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sensitive 60kHz receiver: schematic part two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/</link>
	<description>Detailing the design and build of a 60khz time code receiver and clock.  From PIC programmer to LED clock display.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:34:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/comment-page-1/#comment-11584</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/schematic-part-two/#comment-11584</guid>
		<description>I should probably make it clearer, but if you click the little picture of them on the post they should enlarge.  Direct links are below:
http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockparttwo.jpg
http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockpartone.jpg

It pains me to look at the scruffyness of them now, but I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll be able to work it out!

Let me know if you have any problems, I&#039;d be happy to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should probably make it clearer, but if you click the little picture of them on the post they should enlarge.  Direct links are below:<br />
<a href="http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockparttwo.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockparttwo.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockpartone.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/wp-content/picclockpartone.jpg</a></p>
<p>It pains me to look at the scruffyness of them now, but I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll be able to work it out!</p>
<p>Let me know if you have any problems, I&#8217;d be happy to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Kuker</title>
		<link>http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/comment-page-1/#comment-11583</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Kuker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/schematic-part-two/#comment-11583</guid>
		<description>I would like to build the circuits described, can you please email a schematic to me at Karl.kuker@thelincgroup.com or karl.kuker@gmail.com.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to build the circuits described, can you please email a schematic to me at <a href="mailto:Karl.kuker@thelincgroup.com">Karl.kuker@thelincgroup.com</a> or <a href="mailto:karl.kuker@gmail.com">karl.kuker@gmail.com</a>.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/comment-page-1/#comment-10121</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/schematic-part-two/#comment-10121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment - good point!

If you were to remove the 10n capacitor then the trace would look like picture 3, however with the 10n capacitor there, you get the trace as shown in picture 4.

My mistake when drawing it from left to right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment &#8211; good point!</p>
<p>If you were to remove the 10n capacitor then the trace would look like picture 3, however with the 10n capacitor there, you get the trace as shown in picture 4.</p>
<p>My mistake when drawing it from left to right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/sensitive-60khz-receiver/comment-page-1/#comment-10078</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burningimage.net/clock/2007/10/23/schematic-part-two/#comment-10078</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy,

Thanks for sharing your work.  I have a comment.  In your schematic it appears as though test points 3 and 4 are pointing at the same node yet the pictures you drew of the output are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your work.  I have a comment.  In your schematic it appears as though test points 3 and 4 are pointing at the same node yet the pictures you drew of the output are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
